Last year the World Health Organization released a study of the health and happiness of European adolescents. You can find the study entitled Growing Up Unequal by clicking this link.
In essence, the report found that boys reported that they had greater life satisfaction than did girls, but noted that boys were more likely to be involved in fights and to suffer physical injury. Boys were also more likely to use drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, but the report indicated that girls’ use of these substances was increasing as girls began to mimic boys’ behavior
What do you think? Is your son happier than girls his age? Personally, I don’t think that boys are happier; I think that the problem is a difference in brain maturation. Even if the experts disagree on the effects of cognitive gender differences, all agree that there is a large difference in the rate of maturation of the prefrontal lobe – with girls completing maturation on average several years before boys. Remember, that’s the part of the brain that helps us make reasoned decisions and control our impulses. There is, however, little evidence to indicate when that part of the brain begins to mature, because it has been maturing all along, but the agreement is that there is a difference in the rate of maturation. One indication of this occurs when we switch from reacting to events in our lives with the amygdala and start using our prefrontal lobes.
Don’t worry, I’ll explain. The amygdala is a small portion of the brain approximately at the intersection of lines drawn through your ears and through your eyes to the back of your head. That portion of the brain is involved when we experience strong emotions and it develops a bit faster from birth in boys. Whether or not that can explain young boys’ boisterous behavior is not something we can probably ever know, but it may give them “permission” to be noisy and very active. Certainly, there are boys who are quiet and calm and others who seem unable to control themselves and that difference is probably due to the influence of the amygdala together with societal expectations.
At some point during early adolescence, girls begin to respond to emotional situations with their prefrontal lobes while boys are still responding from their amygdala. When girls start asking – “Why did she say that?” instead of “That is a mean thing to say,” you know they are now responding more with their prefrontal lobes because they are thinking about the effect of the behavior.
So part of the problem with happiness in adolescents is that the boys are just responding to emotions whereas girls have begun to think about how they feel and how their feelings affect them. Combine that approach with the likelihood that girls ruminate (think over and over) and you can understand how girls will begin to report that they are less happy.
What those of us who are parents of boys know is that when boys think about what happens to them, they also are unhappy and deeply so. If that were not true, there would not be a higher suicide rate among males and that statistic is true worldwide. The point is that if you ask a boy if he is satisfied with his life, if he is not actually thinking about his troubles at the time, he is likely to tell you his life is fine. Because of their ruminative habits, girls may be thinking more often about their troubles and that certainly will make them believe that they are miserable.
My point here is that just because a well-respected study comes out and says that boys are more satisfied with their lives is not proof that every boy is. Boys are more likely to fight with others and to use drugs, alcohol, and tobacco and yet the study did not suggest that such behavior might indicate some unhappiness on the part of boys. Another factor is that boys are reluctant to share their emotions with just anyone. Yes, the study was anonymous, but boys are not always honest with themselves much less someone else.
I’m not trying to make a case for boys being unhappy, but I am trying to point out that just because boys may be reluctant to share their emotions with others, that does not mean that those emotions do not exist. Boys are very concerned with what their male peers think, with one facet of this being that boys may be unwilling to state their true feelings, believing that their friends are satisfied with their lives. Once you get boys sharing their feelings, you might be surprised at what is going on inside. The movie Stand By Me has a great scene where two of the younger boys share what their lives are like and then one begins to cry. He makes a disparaging statement about crying and the other boy comforts him. That is a very honest scene because that sort of conversation does happen between males of all ages, but they are not likely to share that knowledge.
Make sure that your son knows that you have good days and bad ones and that we all are dissatisfied with our lives every now and then. Point out that the important point is to keep trying and not to expect success all the time. Success and a happy life come, if we are lucky, after we strive and fail. As Charlie Brown replies to Lucy in the classic Peanuts panel below, “Life does have its ups and downs, you know.”
The year is about to turn again, 2017 will be here before we know it, and this is a great opportunity for students to turn over a new leaf and take a fresh perspective on school. Of course, if this is a regular practice, your son may be one of what a friend calls “Fall Boys.” They have turned over so many new leaves that the ground is littered with them and it looks like fall.
Well, fall is past and spring will soon be here, bringing with it new opportunities and new approaches. Here are some possibilities you and your son can try that might help him manage school.
- Activity – if your son is restless in school, he needs to work that restlessness out. Get him one of the activity trackers and challenge him to walk/run 10,000 steps in a day or 5 miles – or whatever seems appropriate for your child. He should clock some of that movement before school each day and certainly after school. The tracker will remind him to keep moving especially if it is connected to an app on his phone or computer. Most boys will rise to the occasion when there is some sort of competition. See if you can beat him!
- Along with this increase in activity, see if your son and his friends would like to train for a competitive race. Most communities have races that have children’s classes and your son might like to get a group together to compete. Even if the only prize is a T-shirt, it will give him some sign of task completion that he can wear with pride. And, who knows? He may try for a marathon or a half-marathon one of these days.
- If running doesn’t seem to appeal, how about walking? But walking as a game. We live in the country so it is easy to make a game such as how many squirrels do we see today or how big are the new leaves getting? Those of you who live in cities can count the number of people you see as you walk around the block or what signs have been put out. Have your son keep a log of everything that he sees on his daily walks. The walks don’t have to be long, but keeping records of what you see will make the walks more interesting and there is the benefit of developing writing skills as well. Have him record the weather – temperature, precipitation, what the sky looks like – each day. A simple outdoor thermometer and a small rain gauge will make it more interesting. As he gets more skilled, you may have to find a small anemometer to measure the speed of the wind and a barometer to help predict what the weather will be. Paying attention to the weather as you walk may help your son develop skills in observation.
- Chores – One way to help boys develop the organizational skills necessary to succeed in life is for them to have regular household chores. The beginning of a new year is a great time to begin new habits especially if you include yourself in the new behaviors. The point to be made is that everyone in the family does chores. That is part of what makes a family – they work for each other. If he does no chores, you put your child in the same position as a house guest, which means he is not valuing the ties that bind you all together as a family unit. Make sure that the chores are not too simple or he will think you do not respect his abilities, but also not too complicated or he will stop out of frustration. A great time to begin the new chore is when he’s on a school break, but make sure that he knows that this will continue once he is back in school. After all, you do a lot more around the house than he does, and you also likely work outside the home.
- Cooking – many boys enjoy cooking as it may seem like an edible form of making a mess. Start by including him in the daily part of cooking. Take him to the grocery store with you. On the way, discuss what you are planning for the menu for the next several days and what you need to buy to make those dishes. If the meal is one of his favorites, he may be better motivated to help you. There is a great deal of math and science in cooking and having him measure the half cup of milk or the two teaspoons of salt gives him a lot of experience. Yes, it will take you longer to include him at first, but as he gets more skilled, he will be a legitimate sous chef and eventually will be able to prepare meals for the family. The real lesson in cooking is how to organize what you are doing so that everything ends up on the table at the same time.
Your son will not figure out that what he is doing is preparing to do work and so he will be eager to learn these new skills or engaged in these new activities. Work, any sort of work, will help him develop the skills necessary to succeed in life and in school. When children are engaged in real work, they are usually very eager and get absorbed in the activity. That sort of concentration will help him the rest of his life.
Happy Holidays, and I hope that the new year brings you joy and peace.
Have you seen the movie, Stand By Me? If you’re the parent of a male child, you MUST see that movie. It’s the finest portrayal of what the life of 12-year-old boys would be like if they were allowed to decide. The movie takes place in 1959, and in that year, I was the same age as the younger boys in the movie. No, I never did anything exactly like that, but I remember the freedom that we had to go places with other kids. It was that freedom that enabled us to learn to solve problems, to negotiate with other kids, and to find out what we were good at, and what we weren’t.
Would I worry if my 12-year-old son had taken a trip into the woods with three other boys? Absolutely. However, I’d be also very proud of his ability to manage such a trip. My son had 10 acres of woods with a stream on one side in which to play. From the time he was six, the only rule was that he had to be within earshot of a whistle from our back door. Yes, he could have fallen in the creek and hit his head and drowned, but my husband and I decided that we wanted to give him the opportunity to cope with life rather than prevent him from taking reasonable risks.
Several years ago, I was talking with a university professor who told me that he lived in a cul-de-sac that had a large tree in the middle. The tree belonged to the children in the neighborhood and adults were not allowed in it. At any time when the children were not in school, there were likely to be a variety of the neighborhood kids playing in and around the tree. The kids were a variety of ages, and they all learned to get along. Older kids watched out for younger kids, and any kid who lacked the ability to “play well with others” was not invited to join in the fray. There was no need for adults to monitor the activity, because the parents trusted the children to do things right. The important point was that the children were in full view of everyone, and yet left alone.
A father in California has taken this notion to another level and provided a house where children are free to play. Mike Lanza has developed a neighborhood play space, what he calls a “Playborhood.” I have to admit that I’m not entirely comfortable with children playing on the roof of the house, as Lanza allows, but the rest of his play space sounds just fine – and pretty terrific, if you’re a kid.
Several years ago, I read of a play space created by making small doors in the communal fences in a suburban area. There were about six houses that backed up to each other and the children could enter other children’s yards by going through the little doors. If a child wanted to play, she would simply choose a door in her fence and see if there was a child in the neighboring yard that wanted to play. This allowed children the opportunity to play with each other without adult intercession, or supervision.
The concern of allowing this free play is two-fold.
One is that the modern child, who is so addicted to screens, will not want to engage in this sort of free play. However, one reason that the child spends so much time in the screen world may be because his own real space is so boring or totally adult-driven. Many children only play in adult created worlds – for example, they only play soccer on a team, never in a pick-up game in a back yard. Computer games are all written and devised by adults. There seems to be a need by parents to control their children, which can result in children who have no original thoughts, or ability to self-manage.
The second concern is that children need adults around to make sure that no one hurts another child or engages in play that excludes others. Children left by themselves have good ways to deal with these sorts of behaviors and research is clear that children who play regularly in mixed-age groups learn to get along with each other. As it is now, when a child is not comfortable with the actions of another child, they have learned to go and whine to their parents. Then the parents sail in to fix the issue. The result is that the child grows up to lean on others to solve problems rather than learning to stand up for him or her self. What we have done is taught children to be offended by “microaggressions” rather than learning to say, “hey, don’t say that, it’s rude.”
Don’t get me wrong, I know that allowing children free rein to play with others may not always have great results. That’s what Band-Aids and knee patches are for. But the child who never learns to stand up for himself will not be able to do so later in life and will remain dependent on others to referee interpersonal exchanges.
Another important point raised in the article was how happy the children were in Lanza’s Playborhood. They were not always giggling, but they learned to manage themselves and to get out of a situation if they were not happy.
The rate of teen suicide is rising. and while I don’t think that free play is going to solve that problem, it will help teens learn to solve problems. Most people who commit suicide believe that they have no options and that their life is doomed. The child who has learned to cope by managing his own life is likely to understand that there are always options if you just consider what they might be.
Parent – “Why did you do that, you knew that was not allowed!”
Child – “I don’t know why, it just seemed like the thing to do at the time.”
The one gender difference in brain development that most scientists agree on is that the prefrontal lobe, the part of our brain called the executive decision maker, does not complete development in females until somewhere between 18-22 and in males between 20-25. This information has been used to explain why adolescent boys are more likely to be impulsive, engage in risky behavior, and make poor decisions.
In working with teachers and students, I point out that this developmental difference is not an excuse for boys to misbehave, but it does explain why they may find it more difficult to do so. The point is that boys need to develop skills in self-control and learn to manage themselves, not to depend on adults to create appropriate boundaries.
Some teachers have found it hard to deal with when I tell them that disciplining their male students will not teach the boys better behavior. All that happens is that the boys learn not to exhibit that behavior in front of adults. As I point out to teachers, you may be able to make sure that the student behaves inside your classroom, or even inside your school, but he has only learned what not to do. What he needs is to learn positive behaviors which he can use in his life outside of school.
Recent research indicates that may not be enough either. A study reported that young adolescents were perfectly able to control themselves when they were asked to perform a driving game as long as they were alone. They did not make rash decisions, they drove carefully, and completed the task safely in the same way that adults did. However, when the children were part of a crowd of other adolescents, they were twice as likely to engage in impulsive behavior and less likely to make reasoned decisions.
What is fascinating is that adults in the same situations, first alone and then with a group of age mates, did not engage in riskier behavior when they were in a crowd. And that’s the core point: that when you are talking to your child about the decisions that he makes, he is not being influenced by his peers. He knows what he is supposed to do, and gives you the answers that you want to hear. Once he is with a group of friends, it’s as if being in that group hijacks his ability to make good decisions, and he becomes rash and irresponsible.
How do you help inoculate your boy against letting his brain be turned to “the dark side?” First of all, tell him what happens in his brain. Give him the article referenced above so that he will hear this information from someone other than his parents or his teachers. After all, he knows that what we have to say is wrong (parenting is not for the faint of heart).
Second, encourage him to be part of groups where adults are present. That is the point of scouting, 4-H, sports teams, interest clubs (robots, drones), academic competitions (Destination Imagination, Odyssey of the Mind), community service tasks, or any other of a host of adult-facilitated community youth activities. Make sure that the adults take their duties seriously and are present while the children are engaged in the activity. Properly run, these activities will give your son the opportunity to engage with age-mates in tasks which are supervised, but can only be successfully accomplished through risky behavior.
Third, give your child the space to make mistakes. Let him invite a group over to watch or play a game, and help him plan how to feed his friends. When the guys are gone, if there is evidence of irresponsible behavior such as food not properly disposed of, or furniture not replaced where it normally resides, he needs to clean up after his buddies. He may then learn that there are consequences for rash behavior.
Finally, when your son gets his driver’s license, do not let him drive with more than one underage friend in the car at a time. Some locations have laws that prevent adolescents from having any other unrelated teens in the car with them unless an adult is also present. If your area does not have this law, have your son look up areas that do and point out why these laws exist.
Remember, your son can make reasoned decisions and can control his impulses as long as no other adolescents are around him. Make sure he knows that and keep him accountable for his actions. Some children believe that the slower development of their prefrontal lobe gives them a free pass for bad behavior. It does not and they need to know that.
One of the points that I have been making recently is that punishment doesn’t work for boys. OK, it may make sure that the boy does not do that particular thing again, but it doesn’t change over-all behavior. He’ll just find another way to engage with the world. Years ago, Jean Kerr, the wife of a famous theater critic, wrote a book based on her family experiences entitled, “Please Don’t Eat the Daisies.” The family, together with their four boys, moved to the country from New York City, and all of a sudden, Mrs. Kerr had to deal with what happened when you let boys loose in the country. Fortunately, she had a good sense of humor about it all which translated well to movie and TV versions. The title comes from that time Mrs. Kerr had invited some ladies for tea and had warned the boys not to eat the goodies, but forgot to tell them not to eat the floral centerpiece.
Telling boys what not to do doesn’t translate into good behavior. What they need is to learn how to make good decisions and how to control their impulses. These behaviors are controlled by the last part of the brain to develop, the prefrontal lobes. In girls this part of the brain will complete development around 18-22, whereas in boys it does not finish development until 22-25 and perhaps a bit later. If completion of development has a gender difference, you can be sure that children begin development of the prefrontal lobes in a gender specific time with girls before boys.
In small children, emotional reactions are generally centered in a small part of the brain called the amygdala and the response will be emotional. As children mature, they begin to switch from responding out of their amygdala to using their prefrontal lobes, and as you may have predicted, girls begin this switch before boys do. The timing difference in this switch can be quite large and may account for the ability that many adolescent girls have in planning and self-control. You know when a child is using the prefrontal lobe to respond to an emotional event when the child tries to figure out the reason for the event. This is the difference between “stop that!” and “why are you doing that?”
I’ve come across some recent research which supports the notion that many of the problems that boys have in school are due more to their deficits in self-control than to any actual academic problems. Again, the problem is that the teachers do not understand normal boy behavior. A study out this year by Jayanti Owens found that when comparing very young children (four and five years old) with behavior problems in school, that the girls were more likely to be successful in school later on. The problem was not in academics, but in the way that the school responded to the boys’ behavior. The assumption seems to be that boys’ behavior needs correction and that girls’ behavior will get better over time. True, more boys enter school with behavior problems, but the schools’ response to that behavior seems to assume that boys will be problems.
An earlier study looked at the results of elementary aged students on standardized tests. The problem is that girls usually have lower grades on those tests, but get better grades than do the boys. Again, the problem is that the adults in the school give girls an advantage because they appear to be better students because they seem to pay better attention, are more likely to do all the work assigned, and are better organized. Many of those skills depend on early prefrontal lobe development and so some boys are suffering because they are developmentally behind other students. We wouldn’t ask a first grader to play ball with the third graders, yet we compare boys who are not yet able to make long terms plans to children who can and then grade them down for that deficit?
So what can you, the parent, do? Start by pointing out to your son that the world will expect him to make decisions on his own and there is no time like the present to begin. Responsibility for taking out the trash, or at least gathering it into one place where an adult can get it, is a great way to start. Everyone in a family should have a job because otherwise they are just guests. When the trash is not taken out, do not yell at him, he did forget. Tell him that is the reason that he has this job, so that he will learn over time to be responsible. Work with him to figure out what he can do to remind himself about his job – yes, I did say that he will remind himself, not you. If the trash doesn’t work as a chore, find something that involves everyone in the family that is his responsibility. What this does is help him learn how to plan to get things done. It is the planning that he needs to acquire.
Some years ago, someone asked how hard it was for me to go back to graduate school at age 50. “Didn’t I find it difficult working with all of the smart younger students and didn’t I find it hard to keep up with them?” Actually, no. I found my doctoral program much easier to complete than the work I had done for my master’s degree at age 25. At the time, I never considered the difference. It was only later when people would ask how hard it was that I realized that not only was it not hard, but I enjoyed even the most mundane of tasks.
You should know that I have never been a great student. My students love to hear that I almost flunked out of my first year in high school. I failed French and Latin, got a D in English, a C in History, and, while I did get an A in Algebra I, we used the same book I had used at a different school the year before. True, by the time I graduated from high school, I was 10th in a class of 83 so I had improved a great deal. My university career was very modest, I graduated with a C+/B- average. No one then would have selected me for a doctoral program.
So what made the difference? I’ve been reading Angela Duckworth’s new book Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance and I think I know the answer. If you haven’t seen this book yet, I highly recommend it. She begins by pointing out that many people who seem as if they should succeed do not. She points out that she was confusing talent with what she calls grit – her point is that the ability to do something does not predict success. Duckworth quotes Will Smith, the well-known actor. “I’ve never really viewed myself as particularly talented, “he once observed. “Where I excel is ridiculous, sickening work ethic” (p. 46).
The reason that I found my doctoral program enjoyable and, unlike many my age, that I completed it, was that was passionate about my subject – the education of boys. I had spent many years teaching boys and I really wanted to know everything about what made them learn. The second factor in grit according to Duckworth is perseverance. That is what I lacked when I got my master’s degree. That program was two years long, and by the end I couldn’t wait to finish. My doctoral program took four years and I enjoyed it so much I entered a post-doctoral program. Even now, I spend a good deal of my time reading research and trying to see how those studies inform what I have to say to parents and teachers of boys.
If you have read these blogs before, you know that the International Boys’ Schools Coalition (IBSC) annual meeting is coming up and this year I will be speaking on the subject of the latest information supporting the education of boys. One study that came across my desk this year points out that self-discipline is the most important factor for students to enable them to be successful in school and boys in general have very poor self-discipline. I get the feeling that Duckworth’s grit is what boys’ need. I see that characteristic in boys who are dedicated to a sport or a musical instrument, just not to their academics.
So if grit will help a boy succeed in school, what can parents do to help their son develop this characteristic? Years ago, Diana Baumrind proposed a way to describe good parenting. There are two continua for parenting: Demanding-Undemanding and Involved-Uninvolved. The demanding parent requires the child to follow the family rules and the undemanding parents allows the child to do pretty much what he wants to do. The involved parent knows what the child is doing, what the child is interested in, and can be rather nosy. The uninvolved parent does not pay attention to the child, but insists that the parents’ desires come first. Putting these two continua in a chart results in the following types of parenting.
The Authoritative parent is the one who is both involved in the child’s life and insistent that that child follow the parents’ direction. This is the parent who is most likely to produce a child with grit. The Authoritarian parent’s dictum is “my way or the highway” and the child either does what the parent directs never learning how to do things on his own, or runs away. This child may develop grit because he needs to survive on his own. The Permissive parent’s dictum is “let him do what he wants to do,” but the child rarely learns how to make himself complete tasks because he has never been required to do so. We won’t discuss the Absent parent; those problems are obvious.
The students in my Introductory Psychology class are usually surprised to discover that the children of the Permissive parents usually have the most trouble in life because they never learn grit. They can have all the advantages in the world, but because no one held them accountable, they drift off and never complete anything. They are also surprised that children of Authoritarian parents are not as bad off as they would think because they frequently do develop grit – their parents make them finish tasks.
Yes, being an Authoritative parent is difficult and sometimes unpopular, but it is the way to make sure that your son develops the skills to succeed in life. By being demanding, you make sure that he develops skills in persistence and by being involved, you make sure that he becomes aware of his passions in life. It does take both. And when the child of the Authoritative parent fails, his parents are there to make sure that he picks himself up, they don’t do it for him. As Duckworth says, talent is nice to have, but you won’t succeed if you only have that.
Parenting is difficult and no parent can be authoritative all the time. Every good parent slips into the authoritarian realm every now and then, usually when things involve safety or education. Problems crop up when we are tempted to be permissive, letting the child run the show. Remember, the child of the permissive parent will not develop grit, and it is grit that will help your son succeed in life.
What does your child do all day in school?
I’m a teacher, I visit schools all over the world, and what I almost always see is children sitting at desks for at least 30 to 45 minutes at a time. How long can you sit still? I’m typing this and I’m gently moving a bit because my desk chair is a stability ball. When I do research using the virtual library at my university, I put my computer on a desk that allows me to stand. I’ve been known to pace back and forth when I read. When I’m writing and the folks in the office next to mine start making phone calls – it is a business, they’re supposed to do that – I’ll put the sound of a coffee shop on my computer so that sound runs in the background. In other words, I’m not sitting still and I’m not working in perfect quiet. In fact, I can’t do either and to expect children to do that is …… (I just thought of a lot of words it wouldn’t be nice for me to use here).
A columnist for the Washington Post wrote about how tired her children are when they come home from school. What Valerie Strauss reports is that her children, who are in elementary school (age 10 or less), are very tired and worn out by a day at school. She, who has been a teacher, blames the focus on curriculum and testing for making school too focused and less interesting.
Her concern is that there is no play built in to the daily schedule.
I totally agree.
As a science teacher, I have an unfair advantage. There’s something we can do every day in my class that looks like play, but is actually part of the science curriculum. Many science teachers believe that they have to tell the students what they will learn from the lab exercise before doing the exercise.
I’ve had many say to me that if they don’t do that the children won’t learn. I’ve taught for many years and I do it the other way around.
We do the lab first – students are far more engaged when they don’t know what will happen – and then we talk about what the students experienced. When I ask them what they learned, most have already gotten the point. I trust my students to be smart.
When class focuses on telling students the information, they are so involved with trying to remember the material that they frequently miss hearing much of what the teacher is saying. When students are actively engaged in the lesson, it is amazing how much more they remember.
There’s another approach to this. Some Charleston, SC schools are using a program called Active Brains.
In this program, students are given devices that let them move in the classroom while the lesson is going on. This approach hasn’t been in place for very long yet, but early reports are favorable. The biggest problem is getting the teachers on board. Teachers just seem to believe that students can only learn if they are sitting still and quiet.
Two boys’ schools in California are trying different approaches. One has stability balls for every student in the classroom. When all students are sitting on a ball there is no attempt to get attention from others, so students just move gently. I asked one young man in this class who was not moving on the ball if he needed that. He said he didn’t. I asked him if being on the ball was distracting. He told me it wasn’t at all. The other school tried a few stability balls in several classrooms, but found that those boys created problems. This school has had more success with standing desks. Not all students are given the standing desks, but when a boy feels that he needs to get up, he simply moves to the standing desk. These have been very successful.
My point? All children need to move! They actually learn better when they move. Boys in particular are likely to get into trouble because their need to move exceeds the teacher’s tolerance for movement. What teachers do not understand is that when a boy moves, he is actually managing his attention and that if he is not allowed to move, his attention is likely to wander.
Children in the classes in South Carolina and California who are allowed some movement are not more tired, but actually have more energy to give to the lesson. The human body was designed to move and if we prevent that movement, it does not work well. Strauss’s children are tired not because they are not moving, but because it takes a lot of energy for a child to stop moving. That energy is wasted as it could be better used on learning. Teachers have some strange idea that children have to be silent and seated to learn – nothing could be further from the truth. Ever seen children just goofing around outside? They are constantly learning there.
Ever seen boys read? They are constantly wriggling around, but they are reading.
See what you can do to convince your child’s teacher to let children move a bit in class. Point them toward the articles above or have them contact me, I’ll be happy to share some of the information on how children learn better by moving.
When I first went to university (a long time ago), I started in the nursing school. Nurses are amazing people and I totally respect what it takes to be a good nurse, but it wasn’t for me. So I switched my major to education, and became a science teacher. At that time, the medical students at my university were concerned about the numbers of very young girls who were coming into the hospital to deliver babies, so they decided to offer sex education at the local middle schools. Because I was in the education school by that time, and had contacts with the school system, they asked me to participate in the project.
We worked for a long time to develop an age-appropriate program which would cover the basics of anatomy, physiology, emotions, and consequences. We wanted the children to know what was happening to them as they entered puberty and how those changes were related to sexual behavior. It never occurred to us to tell the children that abstinence was the only proper way to deal with sex at their age, mainly because we knew that many of them were already having sex. What we wanted was to help protect them against sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancy. Several local middle school principals agreed to have the medical students visit classrooms giving the talks. The program went on for several years after I graduated and then ceased because of lack of interest by the medical students.
The first teaching job that I was offered in 1970 was based in part on my ability to teach sex education. The school was an all-girls’ school, but even in that setting, having someone teach a very explicit course in human sexuality was unusual. The rest of my teaching positions in secondary school – three more schools, one girls’ schools and two boys’ schools – included teaching sex education. Over the years, I have noticed that the knowledge that children in high school have about sex has declined, but if I read my students correctly, their sexual activity has not.
The problem is that people are embarrassed to talk about sex. They don’t even talk about it with their spouses, much less their children and they can’t imagine discussing sexuality in a classroom. If you have seen the post mortem bodies in the TV shows such as CSI and NCIS, there is a white light in the genital area so that you don’t see that portion of the body on the table. I tell my students that school tends to treat sexuality like that – we talk about emotions, but we don’t talk about the part of the body that is involved with sex. It is as if a government class only talked about constitutions in general and never discussed our own Constitution, how it was developed and its effect on our lives.
More importantly, because our students do not discuss sexuality and sexual behavior in class, they get the impression that their beliefs are correct. Have you seen what is available to them on the Internet? I am sure that you have, and keeping that from your children is not the answer. Having the material presented in an academic setting will help your child understand that we all have sexual feelings, that sexual feelings are normal, and that acting on those sexual feelings is best if you are prepared.
In the same way that the D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) programs do not work to stop children from trying drugs, sexual abstinence programs aren’t working. The reason that these approaches don’t work is that they don’t give kids the skills they’ll need to deal with the situation if they find themselves suddenly in the middle of it. Teens and pre-teens do not have the ability to predict what’s about to happen. Think about it. How many times have you said to your child – “why did you do that?” or “what did you think would happen?” Your child has no idea – remember, the prefrontal lobe, the part of the brain that allows us to make reasoned decisions and to control our impulses, has not yet fully developed in adolescents. What your child needs is skills in understanding what’s happening, and how to extricate himself from a situation he knows is going downhill.
Your child needs a comprehensive course in both sex education and drug education – no lies, no evasions, no whitewashing. That requires a lot of information which most people, actually most teachers, do not have. Remember, I started years ago studying human sexuality and was, for a time, a certified sex educator and I promise you, I get questions every year from my students for which I do not have an answer. What they get from me is “I don’t know the answer to that, but let us work together to find out and then we can share with the class.”
As the parent of a boy, the most important thing you can teach your son is that it is very hard to know when a girl is honestly willing and ready to engage in sex. Many girls have been led to believe that the only way to have a relationship with a young man is to offer sex – they want romance and are willing to give sex to get it. Point out that if the couple is not comfortable discussing which method of birth control they want to use, they are not ready to have sex. Your son also needs to know that many young males may not be totally honest about their sexual activity (or lack thereof) because they have been led to believe that having sex makes you a man. Not true, but that is a conversation you need to have with your son.
Good luck – if you are honest with your son, the chances are better that he will be honest with you.
Here’s a YouTube video about the subject of sex education in America. It’s from HBO’s “Last Week Tonight” with John Oliver – since it’s HBO, it’s somewhat graphic, but not overly so and the information is correct. I highly recommend it for any parent looking for talking points, or a conversation starter, for “the talk” with their kids.
Several years ago, Ann-Marie Slaughter wrote an article for The Atlantic magazine entitled Why Women Still Can’t Have it All . She tells the story of what happened after she became the first woman director of policy planning at the State Department. She “had it all” as the saying goes. She was happily married, the mother of two boys, and had a job that was astounding. However, soon after the job started, her 14 year-old son began to exhibit the typical symptoms of early adolescence – procrastination, lack of communication, poor school work, you know the drill. Her husband supported her totally so that she was able to continue in her dream job, but eventually she came home to her family and her previous job of university teaching. Slaughter’s observation was that the way that high powered jobs are structured prevented her from being effective in both her job and her family life – she had to choose between them. The problem was that the requirements for work meant that the only time she had for herself was on the weekend, when she also needed to be there for her husband and her sons.
Women notice these differences because they feel so responsible for those in their families. Men who have careers and jobs similar to Slaughter’s usually depend on their wives to make sure that meals are on the table, that clothes get cleaned, and that children are taken to and from their various activities. Recently, Slaughter’s husband, Andrew Moravcsik, wrote a piece to describe what it was like to support his wife in her high-powered job.
This pair of essays by a very successful couple outline what much of the problem is with families today: the emphasis is on success and little or no accommodations are offered that allow people to have a life. Slaughter is a brilliant woman whose abilities put her at the top of her field, and she is supremely lucky to be married to a man who managed to survive being the main caregiver for their children. But as he says, “A man in his 30s who cares for a baby is adorable. A man in his 50s who attends to a teenager is suspect.” Part of the issue is that it is difficult for a man to be publicly in a subservient role – to be the one in charge of the house and the one who makes less money.
Years ago, my husband and I found each other in something of the same position. We had a new baby, I had a teaching job and my husband had just started a new practice as a landscape architect. His office was in our house so even though we had a baby sitter, he was the main parent. As our son got older, I did drive carpool, but so did he and he took our son to his after school activities. It was not always easy, but he was determined to be a co-parent in every sense of the word.
Now that our son is in his early 30s, his affection and connection to his father is a joy to see and rather extraordinary. Sometimes I feel a bit jealous of their connection, but then I am extremely proud that they do have this relationship. I hope that my son will be able to do the same for any children that he and his wife may have.
But here’s the thing: we had an unusual situation. My husband’s office was in our house and he worked for himself, setting his own schedule. As a teacher, I was able to have free time during traditional family times such as major holidays and the summer and, once our son was in school, he and I had similar schedules. Slaughter has just come out with a new book, Unfinished Business: Women Men Work Family, in which she elaborates on this theme. The point she makes is that her job as a full-time professor at Princeton allowed her flexibility that her government job did not, and that made all the difference. She is seen as someone who gave up an important position to go home, but what she went home to was an equally prestigious position, just not as public.
Slaughter has choices that many of us do not. But the choices that she made are ones familiar to us all – who comes first? Family or self? Feminists tell women that they should not have to compromise on their careers for family. A good partner will solve all the problems – they can “have it all.” However, parents of boys frequently find that they need our physical presence and without it, our sons can come unglued. Slaughter’s oldest son told her that she couldn’t quit because she was a role model, but his behavior, while normal for a young teenaged boy, told her he needed her. She stayed two years at the State Department and then came back to Princeton where she could more easily juggle her academic career and her family. Even though she had the right partner who was willing to hold down the fort at home, allowing her the opportunity to serve our country, she recognized what her absence was doing to her sons.
My point? If you are a parent, your children need you. If your children are boys, because of their emotionality, they absolutely need you. Yes, it is not fair that some jobs, particularly high powered jobs, make that difficult. In fact, men should not be working that hard either. While much has been said about the problems of boys raised in one-family households, the same could be said about families where the father is rarely home because he has a high-status position that expects long hours. The difference between the two groups is financial, but the cost in lack of parental presence is something we need to think about.